Subscribe to the
weekly newsletter

Views on Peer Review by Early-Career Researchers

18.01.2018

The Peer Review Process for Awarding Funds to International Science Research Consortia: a Qualitative Developmental Evaluation

17.01.2018

Journal Peer Review: A Bar or Bridge? An Analysis of a Paper's Revision History and Turnaround Time, and the Effect on Citation

09.01.2018

Attitudes and Experience Amongst Editors, Authors and Reviewers

14.12.2017

New Feature Aims to Draw Journals Into Post-Publication Comments on PubPeer

11.12.2017

An Ineffective and Unworthy Institution

Should Scientists Receive Credit for Peer Review?

06.12.2017

Make Reviews Public, Says Peer Review Expert

29.11.2017

What Do We Know About Grant Peer Review in the Health Sciences?

29.11.2017

The Future of Research Assessment

27.11.2017

Reviewer Bias in Single- Versus Double-Blind Peer Review

15.11.2017

A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective on Emergent and Future Innovations in Peer Review

02.11.2017

The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals

01.11.2017

Expertise in Sciences and the Decision of What Is Publishable: A Noble yet Endangered Task

30.10.2017

PREreview: A Preprint Journal Club

29.10.2017

The End of an Error?

28.10.2017

Peer Review's Give-and-Take

24.10.2017

Peer Review: Rooting out Bias

18.10.2017

Does Peer Review Identify the Best Papers?

16.10.2017

Difficulty In Finding Reviewers Taints Editorial Decisions

16.10.2017
Subscribe to News