Subscribe to the
weekly newsletter

A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective on Emergent and Future Innovations in Peer Review

20.07.2017

Birkbeck to Investigate the Peer Review Process

13.07.2017

Do Models Affect Junior Doctors’ Trust in Journals?

04.07.2017

Opening up the Black Box of Peer Review

03.07.2017

Emergent and Future Innovations in Peer Review

27.06.2017

China Cracks Down on Fake Peer Reviews

20.06.2017

Is Science Broken, Or Is It Self-Correcting?

19.06.2017

The Allocation of Scientific Grants Should Be a Science

Chemistry Journal Introduces ‘Intelligent Crowd’ Peer Review

13.06.2017

Impressions From the First Published Results-Free Article

12.06.2017

Journal Tries Crowdsourcing Peer Reviews, Sees Excellent Results

09.06.2017

Can Editors Protect Peer Review from Bad Reviewers?

05.06.2017

A Thankless Job That One Firm Wants to Change

01.06.2017

Essential to Good Science

01.06.2017

Crowd-Based Peer Review Can Be Good and Fast

31.05.2017

NIH Finds Using Anonymous Proposals to Test for Bias is Harder than it Looks

31.05.2017

Crowd-Based Peer Review Can Be Good and Fast

30.05.2017

Monument to Peer Review Unveiled in Moscow

26.05.2017

Science's Quality-Control System under Attack

24.05.2017

In Referees We Trust?

17.05.2017
Subscribe to News