Jump to navigation
Enter the article’s url One of our curators will take care of it as soon as possible!
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
The imprimatur bestowed by peer review has a history that is both shorter and more complex than many scientists realize.
Academics often complain about how long it takes for a paper to undergo peer reveiw. A publication reveals several striking observations based on these experiences.
A solution to fix the replication crisis in science: why do scientists not simply sell what they learn from their research?
The growth of open access hasn't significantly changed the publishing landscape as regards impact factor.
Research creates its own problems. Articles may be withdrawn because of irregularities, results can be impossible to reproduce, methods are often non-standardised, and publications may not be accessible. The search is now on for solutions.
Hours spent writing grant applications could be spent actually doing research with a grant-determining formula.