ScienceGeist

Study aims to provide a detailed description of the free version of Dimensions (new bibliographic database produced by Digital Science). An analysis of its coverage is carried out (comparing it Scopus and Google Scholar) in order to determine whether the bibliometric indicators offered by Dimensions have an order of magnitude significant enough to be used. 

This article explores the value of the scholarly database Dimensions from an impact assessment perspective. The results include high correlations between citation counts from Scopus and Dimensions.

Article underlines the risks of distributing excessive honors or resources to people who, at the end of the day, could have been simply luckier than others. Policy hypotheses are addressed to show the most efficient strategies for public funding of research in order to improve meritocracy, diversity and innovation.

The Journal Impact Factor is, by far, the most discussed bibliometric indicator. Since its introduction over 40 years ago, it has had enormous effects on the scientific ecosystem. This paper by Cassidy R. Sugimoto provides a brief history of the indicator and highlights well-known limitations.

Automatic identification of topics from the classification of research publications.

International collaboration improves the impact of average research papers, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.

Proposing and testing a new indicator, the Mantel-Haenszel quotient.

A  large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime, altmetrics, and citation  data.

In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.

Increasing portability, scaling, reproducibility, and convenience of R users and developers.

No generalizable gold OA citation advantage at journal level.

The landscape of the cash-per-publication reward policy in China and reveal its trend since the late 1990s.

ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research.

A set of criteria for the identification of emerging topics is proposed according to the adjusted definition and attributes of emergence. 

We describe the mathematical foundations and structure of TrueReview, an open-source tool we propose to build in support of post-publication review.

A review showing that some metrics in widespread use cannot be used as reliable indicators research quality.